Civil disobediance can be justified in a non-radical way. If the situation is critical to the point where one must "break the rules", then it is reasonable. For example, was it right for Scopes acting disobedient when he taught evolution at a public school? Even though it wasn't considered justified back then, it become a turning point in history for evolution vs. creationism. People should not be forced to do something they do not wish to do. If they act out for the overall better of the situation, then disobedience is considered a justified answer to any problem.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment